3 ms·
> Some students tutor others, also not a new idea. What do you think is wrong with this idea? In college it's frequent to have TAs, students who completed the
by 908B64B197 5y ago
> Some students tutor others, also not a new idea. What do you think is wrong with this idea?
In college it's frequent to have TAs, students who completed the course and did well in it and help with grading assignments, labs and so on. But they aren't just a few weeks ahead of the students they teach.
> Wow that was a full disclaimer and you're...leaning on it, with no elaboration?
Honestly, every time Lambda is mentioned there's a flow of new accounts who "graduated" from these bootcamps and companies that are "extremely satisfied" with these hires... but never is a company actually named! That's strange, to say the least.
- LMYahooTFY 5y ago>But they aren't just a few weeks ahead of the students they teach. Sure, and I find trying to teach something extremely useful for retention. I found it useful to have students who had just finished the content attempt to explain it. > Honestly, every time Lambda is mentioned there's a flow of new accounts who "graduated" from these bootcamps and companies that are "extremely satisfied" with these hires... but never is a company actually named! That's strange, to say the least. Agreed, although it's not obvious to me that it's orchestrated or automatically invalid which seems to be in a background implication here. I saw a discussion about Lambda where upvoted comments were stating clearly false things, and I felt compelled to engage and I'd have made an account to do it. That also looks like astro-turfing/brigading/dislike-attacks/whatever you want to call it. It also looks like individuals voicing their opinions. Having an 'incentive to defend the brand' goes without saying IMO, and is the whole purpose of a disclaimer.