3 ms·
The Scientific American lost its way about 10 years ago when science gave way to politics. I stopped reading it and buying it back then.
by simonblack 5y ago
The Scientific American lost its way about 10 years ago when science gave way to politics. I stopped reading it and buying it back then.
- JohnHaugeland 5y agoOh no, not virtue signalling. Let's all be impressed with how this anonymous stranger is too good for a magazine. Surely this reflects on the magazine.
- simonblack 5y agoNot at all. You can read it that way if you want. Scientific American is a very expensive magazine. I'm not going to spend my money on a magazine that isn't 'fit for purpose'. I want articles on science, not on politics.
- JohnHaugeland 5y ago[flagged]
- decremental 5y agoDid you have to practice to become this insufferable or is it a gift?
- JohnHaugeland 5y agoSick burn.
- dang 5y agoAttacking another user like that will get you banned here, regardless of how wrong they are or you feel they are. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
- dang 5y agoPlease don't break the site guidelines like this. We've had to ask you that before. We ban accounts that keep doing it. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- stevespang 5y agoI 2nd this. SA has lost it's way, should be publishing SCIENCE, not politics and not telling it's writer's what to write either.