3 ms·
This is great. I think it would benefit from having a large catch-all public server ehich people could use if they don't want to set up their own, shile retaini
by derac 5y ago
This is great. I think it would benefit from having a large catch-all public server ehich people could use if they don't want to set up their own, shile retaining the choice to do so. That would improve the UX substantially, I think, although the cost may be too high.
- MattJ100 5y agoIndeed, https://quicksy.im/ https://quicksy.im/ follows this approach, it's as trivial as it can be. My focus with Snikket is on making it as easy as possible for people to run their own server (hosted or self-hosted), and to avoid a repeat of the Google situation where 99% of the network was controlled by a single (volatile when it comes to messaging apps) entity. Snikket may not be for everyone, but that's kind of the point of XMPP. Snikket users can text and call Quicksy users with E2EE, and vice-versa, despite using two different systems.