This is ultimately a nature vs nurture debate. Are humans the way they are due to their inherent 'nature'? Are they genetically set in stone, programmed and mi

This is ultimately a nature vs nurture debate. Are humans the way they are due to their inherent 'nature'? Are they genetically set in stone, programmed and minimally changing from a set point(like an object)? Or are human's the way they are by 'nurture' and does their environment influence their essence and with a changed external environment they can change as well? Science seems to believe it's a bit of both. Look at twin studies and epigenetic expression of schizophrenia for examples. The issue I see with your argument is that it assumes that human's are like objects and therefore heavily 'nature' based. I think science leans towards more of a balance of nature and nurture.