4 ms·
And isn't the company that holds the trademark legally obligated to defend it? My understanding is that if you aren't actively making sure that your trademark
by jawns 5y ago
And isn't the company that holds the trademark legally obligated to defend it? My understanding is that if you aren't actively making sure that your trademark is not infringed upon, it bolsters the case that the trademark has been abandoned.
So it's not like the trademark holder is looking for a fight. The law essentially forces their hand.
- Brendinooo 5y agoCompanies can have the same name if they're in different industries. Seems like Impossible X/HQ or whatever was contending overlap on the nutrition/food side. I'm not a lawyer and I'm not reading this closely as I'd need to in order to be more authoritative, but it seems like most of their trademarks are for non-food-related sectors. "Pharmaceutical Products" is the only one that looks close to "food" in the trademarks I'm seeing on their page. Not sure how you get from that to "recipes, food ingredients, and cooking information", but would love to hear from someone who would know!
- jeremyjh 5y agoAnd yet that is not the story we were told in the SP. We were told a lie.