4 ms·
most people's annoyance with perceived "preachy" vegans comes from cognitive dissonance Let's consider other "preachy" sources to see if this argument holds we
by nitrogen 5y ago
most people's annoyance with perceived "preachy" vegans comes from cognitive dissonance
Let's consider other "preachy" sources to see if this argument holds weight.
Consider replacing "vegans" in this sentence with morally motivated religious evangelists of any kind, or morally motivated pro-/anti-abortion activists, or morally motivated homophobes, or MS/Apple/GNU fanboys/girls.
So no, it's not that people think the preachy group might have some kind of point, it's the preachiness, smugness, and righteous superiority itself that is the problem. The idea that this one group with such a narrow focus has discovered the one true superior way is what's the problem. It's counterproductive to whatever goals the group claims to represent. Moral guilt tripping is a lazy way to shortcut arguments.
- datavirtue 5y agoWhat if no one is guilt tripping but the other side is just uncomfortable as hell with their own easy acceptance of the status quo?
- nitrogen 5y agoThat right there is the textbook definition of guilt tripping. This line can be applied to literally every side of every argument. It has no content, no explanatory power, it's just another excuse for attempted manipulation.
- cheese_goddess 5y agoHow about "meat is murder"? You don't think that's guilt tripping? Or that it's actually an extremely aggressive thing to say that's likely to upset some people?