4 ms·
That seems to be what they are saying. However, Google does not have a good track record of delivering product for non-technical end users. GMail, their one su
by johnyzee 18y ago
That seems to be what they are saying.
However, Google does not have a good track record of delivering product for non-technical end users. GMail, their one succesful homegrown, mass-market, non-search product that I can think of, is a mess (haphazard user interface, no improvement for years, still beta). For such a strategic app, that is worrying.
As for their platform vision, it also seems very scattershot. They have visionary initiatives (GWT, Gears, App Engine, now Chrome) but it seems awfully disjointed with hardly any synergy between these projects.
I think it has yet to be proven that these projects can be integrated into something larger than the sum of its parts. For my money, if they can't do it with Chrome I have no confidence they can do it at all.
- jotto 18y agoGMail has been improved in ways other than UI changes. They have rewritten the HTML, CSS and JS to make it more hackable for Greasemonkey - and in the process, optimized that HTML, CSS, and JS to reduce number of connections and subsequently load time. The backend has seen massive scaling. They added POP and IMAP. I don't know what I would change for GMail. It's a strong email client that gets the job done. I wouldn't consider it "worrying".
- Raphael 18y agoiGoogle is the synergy. This will become apparent early next year.