2 ms·
VAERS data is not verified, as I said, it's self reported. It's useful but not necessarily great for basing hunches on. According to your graph, excess mortali
by Nursie 5y ago
VAERS data is not verified, as I said, it's self reported. It's useful but not necessarily great for basing hunches on.
According to your graph, excess mortality for ages 0-14 for this year is lower than it was in 2019, before the vaccine or the pandemic hit. And the excess mortality in the 15-44 age group is maybe 5000 people across 28 countries. Without knowing the variance in previous years, which is not given in those graphs, that's meaningless and could easily be down to the disease itself. I personally know a lot of people in this age group who have come down with the disease now, as they are starting to go out and socialise a lot more than they were a year ago. It's hard to see how the 'normal range' is calculated on the pooled deaths graphs as there only appears to be about 4 years data there, which is not a lot to go on.
So as I said before, what you have here is vague speculation. You can't tell from there that anything unusual is necessarily going on at all, let alone what might be causing it.
- jacquesm 5y agoBut it did give him what he was looking for: a reason not to get vaccinated. All of the above is just that: justification for that decision, and once looked at through that lens it makes a lot more sense.
- mewpmewp2 5y agoWhat you are saying is that I made the decision first and then looked for the material? I was strongly pro-vax before that, and I was debating anti-vax people. Why would I want to make such a decision that would make me be hated by so many, stress me out of my mind, make people think I'm some sort of anti-science or anti-intellectual, etc? If covid vaccines are truly safe and effective, I would have 0 motivation to believe in some sort of conspiracy, or not take it.