3 ms·
No, that's not what I'm talking about. To try to secure against the analog hole you have to increase background checks, only open documents in secure areas etc.
by eitland 5y ago
No, that's not what I'm talking about. To try to secure against the analog hole you have to increase background checks, only open documents in secure areas etc.
What I'm talking about is a light way to secure documents that are sent with trustworthy technicians out in the field, to prevent against consequences from honest mistakes, not intentional spying.
This worked pretty well in first tests and for the clients demands (but every company should make sure to verify it for their own requirements).
What Microsoft tried to sell us on was that SharePoint should be able apply this lightweight protection automatically to these files.
- GekkePrutser 5y ago> What I'm talking about is a light way to secure documents that are sent with trustworthy technicians out in the field, to prevent against consequences from honest mistakes, not intentional spying. Isn't this what Azure Information Protection is supposed to be?
- eitland 5y agoYep. And somehow SharePoint was supposed to apply either AIP or something similar automatically.