5 ms·
tl;dr: A lot of ivermectin COVID studies are garbage. When you throw them out it seems like there might be a mild positive correlation but that depends on your
by xenadu02 5y ago
tl;dr: A lot of ivermectin COVID studies are garbage. When you throw them out it seems like there might be a mild positive correlation but that depends on your methodology.
But when you look at the bigger picture the decent positive studies often come from areas of the world where parasitic worms are prevalent. There is a specific parasitic worm Strongyloides stercoralis that multiplies out of control sometimes causing death when corticosteroids are taken - the exact kind of corticosteroids that improve survivability for those with COVID.
For good quality studies ivermectin seems positive for COVID in areas with high parasitic worm infection rates and negative for areas without such infections, though more data is needed. This seems like a tidy answer because it shows everyone got part of the story wrong and it has a plausible mechanism of action which was previously lacking (ivermectin kills parasitic worms that suppress the immune system and/or multiply out of control when other drugs necessary to recover from CVOID are given).
- tzs 5y ago> But when you look at the bigger picture the decent positive studies often come from areas of the world where parasitic worms are prevalent. I bet someone could make decent money selling parasitic worm eggs or larvae or whatever the heck it is that gets into people that causes a parasitic worm infection so that people can infest themselves when they get COVID symptoms in order to make the ivermectin they then take more effective. A depressingly large number of the people that end up on /r/HermanCainAward as nominees or winners would believe that is reasonable.