4 ms·
Pathetic response. Misdirection, bending half the points made, ignoring the rest. Go away, stop trying to argue antivax stance is as valid as Galileo’s literal
by nawgz 5y ago
Pathetic response. Misdirection, bending half the points made, ignoring the rest. Go away, stop trying to argue antivax stance is as valid as Galileo’s literal science, the data is clear
- smaryjerry 5y agoYou are arguing in bad faith. You’ve stopped talking about the topic and instead about me. Grow up.
- nawgz 5y agoI'M arguing in bad faith? Tell me who made these quotes. > misinformation is rarely intentional > [banning antivax propaganda suggesting a vaccine given to billions of people will do some yet undiscovered harm from a private web platform] is akin to the church silencing Galileo or banning Copernicus’s books on heliocentric theory because they went against mainstream science at the time > The point is these companies do not have scientists and do not have the latest data [on a topic which we all have the data on] > Misinformation is not impersonation [he says in response to someone telling him to check out how Fox News is quite literally a propaganda arm cosplaying as a news station] You are a hypocrite and a god damn fool. Go away.