3 ms·
This is not very good analysis. The first chart is based on his hypothetical editing of data, and then the second chart is real data but measuring a different
by itsdrewmiller 5y ago
This is not very good analysis. The first chart is based on his hypothetical editing of data, and then the second chart is real data but measuring a different thing (non-covid deaths). And the assertion that these charts look similar so maybe the vaccine is a placebo is foolish. Here is a quote that I think exemplifies the problem:
"Also how is it possible that, at the time vaccination rates are ramped up to nearly 100% of the population, the nonvaccinated are dying from non-covid deaths at almost twice the rate of those who are vaccinated?"
Maybe because the very small minority of people who are not vaccinated are different from the vaccinated population in some other way?
- spywaregorilla 5y agoI've read through this several times and I really don't follow his argument. Is he actually trying to suggest that showing NON COVID deaths look similar to vax'd and non-vax'd people, that the vaccines must be a placebo? His argument seems to be most deaths aren't due to covid so we should ignore covid deaths when evaluating vaccine efficacy? If this is accurate, "not very good" is a vast understatement.