3 ms·
> there is no time/budget to re-do it in house What are the actual time cost savings when you take the total costs into consideration?[1][2] What would it loo
by cxr 5y ago
> there is no time/budget to re-do it in house
What are the actual time cost savings when you take the total costs into consideration?[1][2] What would it look like if you didn't implement an app by stringing together dozens/hundreds/thousands of third-party modules implemented bottom-up, but instead took control of the whole thing top-down?[3]
1. https://jvns.ca/blog/2021/11/15/esbuild-vue/ https://jvns.ca/blog/2021/11/15/esbuild-vue/
2. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24495646 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24495646
3. https://www.teamten.com/lawrence/programming/write-code-top-down.html https://www.teamten.com/lawrence/programming/write-code-top-...
- shadowgovt 5y agoI agree that using node to write browser client code requires more configuration of the compilation environment than I would like (especially since I have to configure both node and some kind of packer to convert all of my es6 module dependencies into one flat pack JavaScript file). That's a small up-front one-time cost relative to writing Redux from scratch. And before anyone asks... Yes, our use case is complex enough to justify a local state storage solution based on immutable state curated via actions and reducers. Just as our rendering use case is complex enough to justify React.