4 ms·
I think this is a “choose your poison” scenario. Are you trying to evade fire, flooding, aridity, hurricane impact etc? There is no silver bullet IMO, you have
by iab 5y ago
I think this is a “choose your poison” scenario. Are you trying to evade fire, flooding, aridity, hurricane impact etc? There is no silver bullet IMO, you have to trade off the negatives. Somewhere with a natural aquifer, not too much surrounding forestry (maybe high deserts)
- jfmatth 5y agohave we seen anywhere that CC has already 'ruined'?
- iab 5y agoI am not sure I get your argument; we wait until climate change has ruined somewhere, and then decide?
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoWhy not too much surrounding forestry? If civilization collapses, you might want access to wood...
- iab 5y agoThat's a good point, but you run the risk of being burned out of your home. I think the emphasis is on "not too much", IMO