4 ms·
Interesting to not see Mikrotik on the list, though I'm not sure how far back you'd need to go to find hardware that's not still receiving firmware updates - ce
by fencepost 5y ago
Interesting to not see Mikrotik on the list, though I'm not sure how far back you'd need to go to find hardware that's not still receiving firmware updates - certainly well over 10 years.
- paulmd 5y agoI also don't see Buffalo. The question is whether they're not vulnerable, or whether they were simply not tested (being smaller brands).
- chasil 5y agoI have a Ubee cable modem with integrated wireless, and this manufacturer is not on the list either. It would also be helpful to see how many vulnerabilities are in the latest release of Gargoyle. I have heard that the best countermeasure for router vendor abandonware is to avoid the 192.168 network entirely, so I configured mine on a random 10. subnet.
- jve 5y agoYeah, incomplete list. Ubiquiti is missing too. Not that Mikrotik haven't had CVE https://www.cvedetails.com/product/23641/Mikrotik-Routeros.html?vendor_id=12508 https://www.cvedetails.com/product/23641/Mikrotik-Routeros.h...