4 ms·

> I have to guess you are using a meaning for "judiciously" that is unfamiliar to me. My mistake. I meant any less judiciously. > It is a fact that "incredib

by zepto 5y ago

> I have to guess you are using a meaning for "judiciously" that is unfamiliar to me. My mistake. I meant any less judiciously. > It is a fact that "incredibly" has had a longer run as a generic intensifier than is usual. No it isn’t. If it was, you’d have some evidence to show.

ncmncm 5y ago
If it wasn't, you would have evidence to show that.
- zepto 5y ago
  Silly. That’s not how facts work. We don’t need evidence to prove something isn’t a fact. It’s only when you claim something is a fact that you need to provide evidence. It’s ok to admit it’s just your perception.