> It uses far less energy than the legacy banking system False equivalence. It supports several orders of magnitude fewer transactions and throughput. >When w

> It uses far less energy than the legacy banking system False equivalence. It supports several orders of magnitude fewer transactions and throughput. >When we finally phase out the legacy banking system completely for cryptocurrency This will never happen. >it will represent a drastic reduction in finance-related energy consumption worldwide Assuming this hypothetical, prove it. Explain mathematically how proof of work supporting global finance levels of transactions would result in a net reduction in energy consumption.