Yes. The article doesn't appear to have any new evidence. A few ad-hominem attacks on Nikolay Zak and a few sneering comments about some of Zak's weaker pieces

Yes. The article doesn't appear to have any new evidence. A few ad-hominem attacks on Nikolay Zak and a few sneering comments about some of Zak's weaker pieces of evidence, but nothing that advances the argument in either direction that I can see.