> You could say the same for all media. Television is advertising-driven, radio is advertising-driven, even the most respectable of literary magazines is advert

> You could say the same for all media. Television is advertising-driven, radio is advertising-driven, even the most respectable of literary magazines is advertising-driven. Most content is pandering to someone or other. I don't necessarily disagree, but what's your point? > It would still be corrosive to society if a single entity controlled the majority of television, or the majority of radio, or... - and that's much the situation that YouTube is in. This is already the case. Additionally, I don't think you've demonstrated that YouTube's video moderation policy is "corrosive to society"