You go right ahead, but I'm not going to discuss the article's main point until I've had time to read up on the relevant background from other sources. Facts ar

You go right ahead, but I'm not going to discuss the article's main point until I've had time to read up on the relevant background from other sources. Facts are not ornamental adjoints to an analysis but the very stuff out of which it is made. Besides, there were other inaccuracies. The article claimed that the British and Dutch governments threatened to freeze assets of Icelanders when it seems the only target was assets directly owned by Landsbanki. That's still extraordinary, especially seeing it was prosecuted under the guise of anti-terror, but it is very different in fact and substance from what was claimed.