3 ms·
You're not getting off this easy. This is what you said: > In 1994, "the west" will supply Chechen insurgents and help them with press campaigns and supply vi
by adriancr 5y ago
You're not getting off this easy.
This is what you said:
> In 1994, "the west" will supply Chechen insurgents and help them with press campaigns and supply via proxy.
Where's the sources that "the west" supplied the Chechen insurgents and helped them?
And please share an English version of wikipedia, not a yandex translated version of a wikipedia page in Russian that has edits which have not even been verified. (which should have an equivalent in English anyway but I could not find it)
What I would expect is similar to the CIA involvement in Afghanistan when Russia invaded which is widely sourced and documented and a quick google search away. If there was such involvement as you say, it would have sources already. (that being 30 years ago)
- thriftwy 5y agoWe're not in court and I don't owe you whatever you demand, while being content with whatever you provide. I'm just saying that, based on Russian wikipedia, Russians have moral base to think they're getting worse treatment from other parties than their own treatment of other parties, so they are on the good side of Kantian categorical imperative. You can't disprove that by just saying "I don't agree", "I don't like your wikipedia" and "My media says otherwise".
- adriancr 5y agoI'm not disproving, you made an statement without sources, that doesn't make it true. If you had sources I would have likely learned something new.