some arguments I've seen (not endorsing any of those) are a) it makes you inflexible (i.e. you cant readjust by constantly hiring people that fit whatever your

some arguments I've seen (not endorsing any of those) are a) it makes you inflexible (i.e. you cant readjust by constantly hiring people that fit whatever your new goals are better) b) it means you are to easy on people and keep low performers around c) b) means it also makes trajectory upwards harder for good employees, so the good employees are more likely to be the few who quit