3 ms·
I have said it at the very beginning of this case. As much as I hate cameras everywhere, this is the one time, I am so glad everyone can see exactly what happen
by A4ET8a8uTh0 5y ago
I have said it at the very beginning of this case. As much as I hate cameras everywhere, this is the one time, I am so glad everyone can see exactly what happened. There is no 'he said, she said'. We can all see what happened from multiple angles ( including FBI drone ).
If that is the case, it goes down to the 'narrative'. Was the Kyle a poor kid trying to get away from vicious mob and killing in self-defense, a blood-thirsty vigilante with ties white supremacist movement, or something in between?
A lot of people have already decided. At this point, I am just waiting to see if the jury upholds the right to self-defense. If they don't, riots next year are bound to be much worse.
- YeBanKo 5y agoCould you please link the videos you are talking about? Every time I try to find them, I end up with videos overlayed with a bunch of commentaries and opinions, low resolution/quality or without clear marks of who is where and timeline of the events. I genuinely am wondering if I missing anything.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 5y agoSo when it first happened NYT had all the videos listed here: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/27/us/kyle-rittenhouse-kenosha-shooting-video.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/27/us/kyle-rittenhouse-kenos... I tried accessing them now, but paywall hit me hard.
- smaryjerry 5y agoThis is a real issue on YouTube and every single website that censored any mention or video about Kyle Rittenhouse. There was probably 20 angles I saw the first day after this happened that I couldn’t find again because every website took the videos down. If a person and not a corporation had done that in a topic they could be facing obstruction of justice charges.