3 ms·
I think you have to look at that the other way around. Why would you have an inherent right to stop somebody else doing something with their own property just b
by iudqnolq 5y ago
I think you have to look at that the other way around. Why would you have an inherent right to stop somebody else doing something with their own property just because it happens to be near you?
- kkjjkgjjgg 5y agoUltimately there are no inherited rights, only guns. So I am not sure what argument you are making? I thought you could come up with some fundamental principle, like "human society would be better if we all adhered to this rule, because bla bla and so forth". As I stated elsewhere, I think communities or governments sell land under certain premises. For example (possibly) that people buying become part of the community and get a vote in further developments. That would be a reason why they would have "the right" to interfere.