How about if you were sick, but there was a serial killer who had a 98% of dying that, due to this sort of argument, was utilizing resources that would increase

How about if you were sick, but there was a serial killer who had a 98% of dying that, due to this sort of argument, was utilizing resources that would increase your chance of survival from 10% to 95%? This argument fails to show that when it comes down to it, there's more than one person and their associated who get affected by the decision to invest those resources. The benefits to one person come at the expense of another in current healthcare situations.