It would be weird to make a policy just to prevent people's property from increasing in value, don't you think? Especially if you consider that improving the lo

It would be weird to make a policy just to prevent people's property from increasing in value, don't you think? Especially if you consider that improving the location (building better roads and infrastructure) would also increase the value. That would be a typical socialist failure, I think, that would only ensure nobody can have nice things. I don't think I would oppose policies that help other people, as long as they don't devalue my property (hypothetically, as I don't actually own any real estate).