4 ms·
I still don't understand their obsession to limiting 'likes/favorites' access to about 3200 tweets. AFAIK, a lot of people use these as bookmarks. And a lot of
by srvmshr 5y ago
I still don't understand their obsession to limiting 'likes/favorites' access to about 3200 tweets. AFAIK, a lot of people use these as bookmarks. And a lot of patterns can emerge from what people favorite. Restricting access to such metrics for developers is a self-goal especially if they are targeting ads for Twitter users
- riffic 5y agoit's an abuse vector, and the rate limits are there to prevent abuse.
- foxhop 5y agoThey didn't build the API to deal with people using it in a useful way so instead of making it useful they use limits to guard against use or over use. As a result they also prevent abusers / attackers from causing denial of service (thus busting SLAs and waking up tired engineers).
- srvmshr 5y agoIf we are talking of abuse vectors, they should similarly be limiting access to followers and tweets by hashtags. Those are at a higher risk of abuse. I can look up a hashtag or follower list and simply run a bot to selectively reply at those accounts. Rate limited as a bonus too. It is but poorly conceived if that is the reason.