3 ms·
One thing that would be beneficial: A version of Visual Studio strictly for .NET 6 and zero backwards compatibility with other versions of .NET. That code has t
by ChicagoDave 5y ago
One thing that would be beneficial: A version of Visual Studio strictly for .NET 6 and zero backwards compatibility with other versions of .NET. That code has to be so bloated with compatibility in mind that it's 10x bigger (and slower) than it needs to be. And no, VS Code is no substitute for VS.
- ChicagoDave 5y agoName it Visual Studio Core.
- nathanaldensr 5y agoI completely agree. It's time to leave the legacy of .NET Framework behind forever.
- jmnicolas 5y agoThis is Microsoft we're speaking here, backward compatibility is in their canon!