4 ms·
That 6 kB WebP looks awful. This seems a bit apples-to-oranges. To make the argument that WebP is better than dithering, the author should compare the 30 kB di
by cbarrick 5y ago
That 6 kB WebP looks awful. This seems a bit apples-to-oranges.
To make the argument that WebP is better than dithering, the author should compare the 30 kB dithered image to a 30 kB WebP. Or even compare to a smaller WebP that lacks obvious compression artifacts.
In the comparison as given, I would not say that the WebP is a better image.
- jmull 5y agoYou really think it's more awful than the dithered image, as a representation of the original? Dithering has it's own aesthetic, and if that's what you want, then by all means, dither away. But to say that dithered image is a better representation of the original than that webp seems way, way off base to me.
- dinkelberg 5y agoI think you might have mixed up the different images at the end of the article. The image labels are a bit confusing.