> After that, convert it to a static language I don't think you can have a hard and fast rule like this. It will depend on the situation. In many instances, a

> After that, convert it to a static language I don't think you can have a hard and fast rule like this. It will depend on the situation. In many instances, a "prototype" built in Python or similar is perfectly fine. In addition, one can make a horrendous mess in statically typed languages as well. One of the absolute worst projects I ever worked on was written in a popular statically typed language. This is of course an anecdote and not to say statically typed languages are worse, but they're not automatically better either. Just a note too that I'm a big fan of, e.g., Rust & TypeScript, and I often use type hints in Python, so I'm not anti-static typing.