3 ms·
Wisconsin bias, but I'm glad they decided upon a map that didn't have WI above MN and MI, but the placement of NY is crazy.
by james-skemp 5y ago
Wisconsin bias, but I'm glad they decided upon a map that didn't have WI above MN and MI, but the placement of NY is crazy.
- zokier 5y ago> the placement of NY is crazy. I tentatively agree, I'd try harder to keep coastal states on the "coasts" in such tile map. That being said, I don't know how hard that would be in practice.
- james-skemp 5y ago> I'd try harder to keep coastal states on the "coasts" Especially for states where the coast is one of the defining characteristics of the state. :) For the final map I think that coast could have been increased in size. But you're right that could have had cascading effects.