4 ms·
I guess people just take it for granted, but can you state a fundamental reason why people should be forced to live next to affordable housing? What if I pay e
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
I guess people just take it for granted, but can you state a fundamental reason why people should be forced to live next to affordable housing?
What if I pay extra money to live in a nice location, say with an unobstructed view to a lake or whatever. Why should there be a law that decides my neighborhood has to be destroyed for the sake of "equality"?
Does equality (or "non-inequality") mean nobody is allowed to have anything that somebody else doesn't have? Because that sounds like full blown socialism to me.
What about San Francisco - I hear they have many homeless and people defecating on the streets. Should everybody be forced to live on streets with defecating people? What if people pay extra to live in a ice neighborhood?
- iudqnolq 5y agoI think you have to look at that the other way around. Why would you have an inherent right to stop somebody else doing something with their own property just because it happens to be near you?
- kkjjkgjjgg 5y agoUltimately there are no inherited rights, only guns. So I am not sure what argument you are making? I thought you could come up with some fundamental principle, like "human society would be better if we all adhered to this rule, because bla bla and so forth". As I stated elsewhere, I think communities or governments sell land under certain premises. For example (possibly) that people buying become part of the community and get a vote in further developments. That would be a reason why they would have "the right" to interfere.