I just meant that I think the judge simply has no idea of how computers draw images to screens, and that he wasn’t making a sophisticated argument about the ris

I just meant that I think the judge simply has no idea of how computers draw images to screens, and that he wasn’t making a sophisticated argument about the risks of AI-based upscaling or unverified closed source software or some other kind of techno-trickery. And furthermore that this isn’t a slight on him, given how hard it is for the public to divine exactly how technology works, as illustrated by Xerox.