4 ms·
> It would seem very unlikely to me that governments are choosing to ignore this new data when deciding to introduce new lockdowns Why? As I understand OPs po
by peteradio 5y ago
> It would seem very unlikely to me that governments are choosing to ignore this new data when deciding to introduce new lockdowns
Why? As I understand OPs point, they threw out the playbook built for just this purpose. New data which contradicts the original playbook ought to be explained not wholly dismissed and now we are doing something different.
- walterbell 5y agoPandemic Playbooks (2008) US ACLU, Pandemic Preparedness, the Need for a Public Health Not a Law Enforcement / National Security - Approach (41 pages), https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/privacy/pemic_report.pdf https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/privacy/pemic_... (2011) UK Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Strategy (70 pages), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213717/dh_131040.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/... (2017) US HHS Pandemic Influenza Plan (52 pages), https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/pdf/pan-flu-report-2017v2.pdf https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/pdf/pan-flu-repor...
- spuz 5y agoSorry I don't understand what you are saying. What new data are you referring to? How does it contradict the original playbook? What is the thing we are doing differently? Bear in mind that people reading this comment thread probably have a very different context from which they understand the current situation than you do. I'm a bit lost with where you are going here.