3 ms·
> was rooted in ignorance Not sure I follow. Someone questions a technical process because it might add extra information seems like a fairly cogent thought an
by anonu 5y ago
> was rooted in ignorance
Not sure I follow. Someone questions a technical process because it might add extra information seems like a fairly cogent thought and awareness of tech. Even if it's not described or discussed in technical terms.
- kzrdude 5y agoYes I think it's good if the judge has a deep respect for "There might be things I don't know here" instead of jumping to judgment
- jl6 5y agoI just meant that I think the judge simply has no idea of how computers draw images to screens, and that he wasn’t making a sophisticated argument about the risks of AI-based upscaling or unverified closed source software or some other kind of techno-trickery. And furthermore that this isn’t a slight on him, given how hard it is for the public to divine exactly how technology works, as illustrated by Xerox.
- post_break 5y agoIgnorance and skepticism are completely different things.