4 ms·
This doesn't make sense. The blog seems to be annoyed at how .NET is managing to push out new features whilst still support decades of corporate code. Their bi
by moritonal 5y ago
This doesn't make sense. The blog seems to be annoyed at how .NET is managing to push out new features whilst still support decades of corporate code.
Their biggest gripe seems to be that Rider's default templates still have old references, and how they "might" follow a tutorial incorrectly that might not work and dishearten a new user so much they give up on the whole language, all the while overlapping the definition between ASP.NET and C# (which of course, could be improved, sure).
- lloydatkinson 5y agoIt's a pretty poor and very short article
- DrBazza 5y agoVery few languages throw away syntax or features. Python 3 is one that tried, and it took almost a decade for people to switch. C++ famously clings on to old features for a long as possible. Only a tiny amount of things have ever been removed from the language such as trigraphs.