4 ms·

I don't think transferring a file via netcat without any form of encryption is something i would recommend, unless you are on a network you 100% trust. EDIT: i

• capableweb 5y ago
  Not supporting HTTPS together with falsely claiming "no server involvement" when everything happens via the server makes me think this is a honeypot or something like that.
  • vermilingua 5y ago
    If there is no server involvement, how could there be HTTPS, which by definition requires some trust in the server?
    • macksd 5y ago
      The web page must be served from somewhere, even if the server it came from really wasn't involved in file transfers. It would be nice to have HTTPS for the client to rule out MITM attacks or the like.
      • christophilus 5y ago
        The client can be sent encryption keys, generated by the server, and use them for P2P encryption, so the MITM can be avoided.
        • macksd 5y ago
          That's great if the server that sends the encryption keys is actually the server you think you're talking to.
• Proven 5y ago
  Why? I can encrypt the file before sending it
• kwhitefoot 5y ago
  Just add gpg to the pipes.