> They covered the most popular footage at the time, which was not the footage that exonerated Sandmann. Of course it was. There was not one video or angle tha

> They covered the most popular footage at the time, which was not the footage that exonerated Sandmann. Of course it was. There was not one video or angle that showed the protestors were trying to escape and being blocked > They published their correction to the original article on January 22nd (3 days after their first article, 4 days after the incident in question). Pretty quick fix if you ask me for this sort of stuff. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/picture-o https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/picture-o... 3 days! 3 days of ruining a kid's life, riling up a hateful mob of violent angry lunatics calling for him to be killed, calling him racist and white supremacist. Meanwhile all the footage was out! It was malicious lies. I don't know how you can excuse such disgusting lies.