4 ms·
Im sorry, But the issues raise have more to do with a particular implemention -- that is outdated -- then YAML in general. E.g. "on" should no longer be treate
by transfire 5y ago
Im sorry, But the issues raise have more to do with a particular implemention -- that is outdated -- then YAML in general.
E.g. "on" should no longer be treated a true. Thats a 1.1 version archaism. And 3.10 is going to have the same issue in JSON.
No doubt YAML could still be improved and maybe we'll get there eventually. 2.0 is a long discussed goal, but the creators of YAML (who I have talked to extensively) are cautious, thoughtful and methodic and won't make that jump until they are sure of it.
Meanwhile 1.2 is a fairly good spec, and difficulties largely lie with implementors and users.