4 ms·
> The belief that we’re different from other organisms may be an incurable human illusion. Except some of us don’t share this belief, at least not as it is nor
by PeterWhittaker 5y ago
> The belief that we’re different from other organisms may be an incurable human illusion.
Except some of us don’t share this belief, at least not as it is normally understood. Don’t get me wrong, I believe I am different from crows and monkeys and dolphins…
…I just believe these differences to be quantitative, not qualitative - and it is the qualitative differences most articles like this opine upon (souls, levels of self awareness absent in other creatures, etc.).
Given that I do not believe in souls, it is easy(ish) for me to consider qualitative differences and conclude that only arrogance would support my dismissing self awareness among crows and monkeys and dolphins.
They may have it. They may not. And if they do, it may be alien to ours, so different they don’t think we have it either.
I am very comfortable believing and asserting that the differences between us and them are merely quantitative, more or less muscle here, more or less specific brain function there, perhaps largely equivalent affective function.
- guerrilla 5y agoAmen. And I think this much simplifies the research project to: Why are humans so arrogant? That seems much easier to answer with evolutionary biology.
- hypertele-Xii 5y agoThere's something funny going on with regards to scale in the universe. Many of the qualitatively best things turn out to be composed of ridiculous quantities of much simpler things. Even down to particles and waves. The Tracy-Widom universality class posits that when a critical mass of simple things is achieved, those things begin to operate in complex concert, thus reaching new qualitative potentials. Food for thought.