4 ms·
Then you get a separate battery. But the vast majority only drives their car back and forth to work, so most of the day the cars are just standing there and cou
by Ma8ee 5y ago
Then you get a separate battery. But the vast majority only drives their car back and forth to work, so most of the day the cars are just standing there and could be charged.
- ThalesX 5y agoIf we’re speculating about the future, having cars sit by idly all day seems like a good target for disruption. I’d like to believe we’ll get to the point where we share self driving vehicles or own some that go on about their day producing profit. The cars could also charge themselves in the process.
- na85 5y agoAll it would take is one person smoking in their shared car to ruin it for the rest of us. Once a vehicle (or a home) has been smoked in, you can never completely get the smell out. It makes me nauseous to sit in that smell for any length of time.
- pkdpic 5y agoIm all for having a more robust ecosystem of shared vehicles. But it does make me think of the rough physical state of shared scooters and bikes in my neighborhood...
- Ma8ee 5y agoHotels have solved that problem by simply prohibiting smoking in most rooms, and if you get caught doing it anyway, they’ll charge you a high fee to sanitise the room.
- ThalesX 5y agoFor around two years I’m constantly using shared cars via apps. I’ve had almost zero issues. If the car is dirty or smells you can review it and one would assume repeat offenders get booted off.
- nitrogen 5y agoThe shared-everything vision of the future ignores the extent to which people's cars serve as extensions of their home and storage. Having a bunch of stuff always available when you need it, and knowing that nobody else will stink up the place, means that personally owned cars will remain popular for a very long time.