> Our sense of me-ness seems real but it probably shouldn't be from a scientific POV. Everything we observe goes through our first-person-perspective, therefor

> Our sense of me-ness seems real but it probably shouldn't be from a scientific POV. Everything we observe goes through our first-person-perspective, therefore there's no such thing as a "scientific" POV. We come to consensus, true, but it's still through first-person-experiential phenomena, and not some kind of external "science" validator. > The borders of me-ness are also interesting to consider. There's already a slight feeling that tech like cellphones could become an extension of our body. I'm not sure what cellphones have to do with anything, there are much better examples of the "fuzziness" of identity: conjoined twins, multiple personality, schizophrenia, dementia, corpus callosotomy, etc. These are all edge cases, though. We still barely understand the degenerate case.