4 ms·
This is a good effort. The tech stack seem to work well and results are mostly on topic. Some results are off though, for example this article https://morningb
by freediver 5y ago
This is a good effort. The tech stack seem to work well and results are mostly on topic.
Some results are off though, for example this article https://morningbrief.ai/l2/0/h64qAA https://morningbrief.ai/l2/0/h64qAA showed as recommendation for 'search engine results page'. Perhaps instead of a tagger consider using NLU models (embeddings).
Some recommended topics have not results like 'life extensions'.
It sometimes shows results 6+ days old - not sure why if the goal is to have a daily brief (so should be around 1-2 days old at most).
I like that you have a paid plan from start, but would probably hold off subscribing until I can get at least 3 month multi-topic trial to see if it is worth it first.
Currently the weakest side of the service is design and UX.
- jv22222 5y ago3 months free trial! Holy shit we’ll go bankrupt. That said, we’ll probably go bankrupt anyways ;)
- freediver 5y ago‘Destiny convergence’ heh. Can you not bring the cost down to $50/mo until you reach product market fit?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- jv22222 5y agoOh BTW I forgot to say. For topics like "Life Extension" it's true that there are not a lot of links. But that doesn't matter too much. Just add it to your brief and when something pops up you'll get it. I have about 5 very low traffic topics in my brief, and it's actually quite nice when they show up from time-to-time. Kind of like a bonus.