2 ms·
I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to. I'm looking at the still frames in 1080p. I see the bullet holes absolutely don't match up. At 3:38 they are no
by bhaak 5y ago
I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to. I'm looking at the still frames in 1080p.
I see the bullet holes absolutely don't match up. At 3:38 they are not as deep and wide as in 3:44. But also the actors position is different especially the mouth (closed in the first, open in the other). Continuity errors.
The morph effect is somewhat cringy but to be fair, they always were. At least in DS9 and Terminator 2 there were in-universe explanations why they existed.
There's also something weird going on with the eyes to the T-1000 after the morph effect has finished. Not sure if that was intentional.
- rootusrootus 5y agoThe part that jumped out to me in that CGI was the mannequin. The bullet hole morphing is so obvious that in a way it's less objectionable.
- knorker 5y ago100% of the frame has a different quality in the clip that went through the computer. Like they smeared something over the lens. Also check out the "goes through the bars" shot. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. Look at things like color grading, and things that look like "upscaling" (but aren't).
- bhaak 5y agoMaybe it's that why I don't see it or at least it doesn't spring out to me that much. Because it's like an upscaling effect that also could be an overuse of HD makeup. I've seen that in contemporary movies or series (or badly configured HD TVs) and it doesn't have a dissociative effect on me seeing it in this movie because I just don't remember how movies from that era shouldn't be looking like that.