3 ms·
>U.S. military may be about the only military force that is both capable of committing these mistakes/war crimes and investigating them I'd prefer if they just
by Barrin92 5y ago
>U.S. military may be about the only military force that is both capable of committing these mistakes/war crimes and investigating them
I'd prefer if they just not did them in the first place. I consider the alleged transparency simply to be a more subtle form of propaganda. It simply exists to give more credibility to warfare. It's in a sense how everything around American society is structured. When you make everyone belief they can be a millionaire they're not going rebel although they won't, when you get people to voluntarily fight they'll do it eagerly, etc
Also as a psychological mechanism it is a kind of reverse version of what Adorno called secondary antisemitism. Which is the kind of antisemitism where someone will use the crimes committed against the Jews against them. (for example "I hate them, they've ruined the idea of German nationalism!"). Arguing to take American war-crimes as an opportunity to appreciate American virtue in dealing with them is to relegate the victim to an object, and to basically declare the American moral character the most important thing in the world, which is very bizarre.
- lordgrenville 5y agoFollowing through on your analogy, though, this would be akin to "secondary patriotism" - responding to criticism of your country with mitigation: "well, we've done bad things, but at least we have mechanisms for internal criticism and improvement". Put that way it doesn't sound so bad.