4 ms·
So... and I mean this genuinely: that isn't the point I was addressing, but I suppose if you understood it to be "word salad" then reading comprehension isn't y
by sennight 5y ago
So... and I mean this genuinely: that isn't the point I was addressing, but I suppose if you understood it to be "word salad" then reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.
Maybe its time for you to reconsider the wisdom of framing this as some kind of game with sides? Or maybe just tone down the mind reading, because you don't do it very well.
- ajross 5y agoI framed it as a game with sides because it clearly is: you jumped into a discussion about a seemingly undeniable truth (vaccines work) with a bunch of evidence about... other stuff that clearly is aimed at the people who believe that truth, designed to (I guess) justify the disbelieve of the obvious truth, or undermine faith in it, or... something. It's clear to me that you're on the "side" of "don't take the vaccine". Are you not? Are you vaccinated? If so, why argue against the data in the linked article?