Ah, thanks, TIL something again. Seems (at least the original version you described of) subversion was in some/several/many ways genuinely inferior to git. Bu

Ah, thanks, TIL something again. Seems (at least the original version you described of) subversion was in some/several/many ways genuinely inferior to git. But yeah, having thought about it a bit more re-applying the same change again in any versioning system is of course not necessarily "a no-op" if they're not immediately following each other; if other changes that partially reverted the original ones have happened in between. Then re-applying the original changeset would of course re-do that part of the original changes.