Well, thanks redhat! But, if the state of graphics on linux is so bad, why are they spending their scarce resources writing an entirely new graphics stack rathe

Well, thanks redhat! But, if the state of graphics on linux is so bad, why are they spending their scarce resources writing an entirely new graphics stack rather than maintaining the one that works? This is IMHO the firefox/etc problems all over, instead of fixing user visible problems, while their market share plummeted they were creating an entirely new programming language to rewrite the browser in (something their competitors apparently didn't need to do). Result, eventually they can't afford to do either option because they ignored the fact that exactly 0% of their users cared about whether the browser was written in rust, or some limited subset of C++ that could be maintained. Also, if one looks at the graphics drivers in linux, there are dozens and dozens of them that aren't amdgpu, intel, or nvidia. How many of those actually work with wayland? I'm fairly certain it isn't many. PS: Also, if someone tries to participate, but is ignored, who is at fault? Much of the opensource community works by working to find near 100% consensus. Thats why it takes forever sometimes to get a solution. Yet, when nvidia does stick their toes into it, their contributions are ignored because "we know better", despite their market share? Doesn't sound like concensus, sounds like they got run over.