It is never encouraging when I see that a project is at least 6 years old and has unapproachable documentation like you describe, and language about how they'll

It is never encouraging when I see that a project is at least 6 years old and has unapproachable documentation like you describe, and language about how they'll stop changing the backup format "when 1.0.0 is released." Like...maybe it's time to stop working on new features, and focus on a release. Duplicati has a similar problem. They're endlessly tinkering with new features instead of squashing bugs and meeting user expectations. I think it still chokes and permanently corrupts backup archives if you interrupt it during the initial backup. Like: guys. People expect backup software to be able to handle interruptions and disconnects. It's actually one of the things I liked the most about Crashplan, and it could handle being interrupted without issue...nearly a decade ago.