4 ms·
Assuming this wasn't some sort of kickback, doesn't the willingness to pay contractors £2k per day while shedding full-timers suggest that there is something ab
by tlianza 15y ago
Assuming this wasn't some sort of kickback, doesn't the willingness to pay contractors £2k per day while shedding full-timers suggest that there is something absolutely crippling about the terms for full time employment?
Is it regulation?
- ig1 15y agoI imagine at that price point either: 1) The skill set is rare enough that the only choice for the company is to hire a contractor 2) The company only needs the skill-set for a short period of time, i.e it doesn't make sense to hire someone who'll cost 300k/year when you only really need them for three months